All posts by admin

How To Get A Canadian Business Loan For Franchise Funding Solid Franchising Lending Tips

By admin on

They usually always start with only one question. Who is ‘ they ‘? Its clients with that age old question ‘ How hard or difficult is it to get a business loan for a franchise in Canada these days? They of course have made one of the biggest decisions in their lives/ careers, vis a vis becoming a franchisee in this booming industry – now the only problem is …’ What type of franchise lending and funding is available ?’

Well, we’ll share with you some tested and proven strategies around franchise financing in Canada, focusing on completing a successful transaction in a minimum amount of time, with a finance plan that works for you, not just the lender!

On its own franchising has somehow become an industry with a strong and viable reputation. It, like all industries was hammered hard during the 2008-2009 recession; bus has bounced back strongly, even moreso than many other industries.

So, it becomes a simply two part question then, can you get a franchise loan these days, and more importantly, how?

There are some key factors to consider, one of which is simply aligning you, hopefully with a strong franchisor. So once you have made the decision to partner with a franchisor (we use partner because we think they need you as much as you need them!) you only need one thing. Whats that one thing?

It’s a ‘ package ‘. By that we of course mean that you need a solid little package that convinces both the franchisor, and of course moreso the lender that you are equipped, from a financial and planning perspective to be a winner as a franchisee.

So what are the key elements of a successful winning plan? It’s really pretty basic stuff, and in our experience many good franchisors have already done a good job of helping you prepare for this. Those key elements are as follows – an overview of your own background and experience, an overview of the franchisors business ( its your new business too, by the way!) and a solid financial plan that demonstrates two things: how you will make money , and of interest to the lender, what type of cash flow you will have to repay the loan!

It’s a bit of mis information when franchisees come to us having assumed the franchisor helps them get the financing. Some do assist in a mild sort of way, but we can assure you that you’re on your own when it comes to achieving final success.

So the question then becomes how do you get prepared and qualified? Answers as follows! Get working on that business and financial plan we talked about. Identify the amount that you can contribute to the business, essentially your ‘ owner equity ‘, with the rest coming from your loan or loans. Typically a minimum of 10% and up to 30-40% is required.

It’s always helpful to know how the last guy succeeded, don’t you think. In reality the largest per cent of franchise financing in Canada is done via a government sponsored loan that’s formally called the BIL/CSBF program. Why that loan , and why you should investigate it ?Some great reasons are 5-7 year payback terms, great market interest rates, no pre payment penalties , and you don’t even have to personally guarantee the full loan . Is there a better deal in town? Maybe, it just that we haven’t found it.

We also hasten to add that for any type of business loan, and certainly in franchise lending, the funding and approval of your loan assumes you have a reasonable personal credit history.

So, want to get with the program? Speak to a trusted, credible and experienced Canadian business financing advisor who can assist you to meet your franchise funding and lending needs, today!

Summer Youth Employment Program Is A Win-win

By admin on

October2009 If you want to know how intractable the unemployment problem is in Detroit, talk to any group of 18 – 24-year-olds and you’ll be amazed at how few have ever had a summer job.

That’s why McDonald’s owner and operator, Jamar Thrower, decided that the Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP) was an opportunity he couldn’t refuse.

“We are always open to getting involved in anything positive to help the community,” said the owner of Jamjomar, Inc. “This was an unbelievable chance for us to train young people at no cost to us, then have them ready to hire when the summer was over.”

Thrower is one of dozens of for-profit employers who participated in SYEP this summer. The Detroit program, which serves an average of 2,500 youth each year, received an injection of $11.2 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act this summer. The federal money helped increase the scope of the program to serve about 7,000 youth ages 14 – 24.

SYEP Participation is Good for Business

With the drastic increase in the number of youth served, City Connect Detroit, acting on behalf of the Detroit Youth Employment Consortium, decided to enlist the help of the business community in addition to the traditional non-profit supporters of the summer program. It was not an easy sell.

“In a troubled economic climate, many businesses were focused on downsizing, not making room for new employees,” said City Connect Detroit CEO Geneva J.Williams. “But when we made it clear that we were providing the youth and paying their salaries, many businesses jumped at the chance to give young people a taste of the real work environment.”

Thrower employed 13 youth in his two Detroit stores. “In such a depressed time, it’s important to expose kids to earning a paycheck and to teach them accountability,” said Thrower, who trained his SYEP youth in all aspects of running his business. “It was such a good experience for me as the employer, I would have no trouble recommending that other stores in our consortium participate next year.”

Cultivating Future Employees

C. has a bad temper-one that landed her in front of a judge earlier this year after the 20-year-old stabbed someone in a fight. The judge gave the first-time offender a choice: Go on probation and get a job, or go to jail.

“I picked probation,” she said. “I’m so glad I was given a chance.”

C. ended up in SYEP doing conservation work with the Greening of Detroit. “This is my first time having a job,” she said while composting at Elizabeth Gordon Sachs Park near downtown Detroit. “It feels good to have a paycheck.”
The biggest lesson she’s learned is how to stay to herself. “You get quiet when you do work outside,” she said. “At first it was uncomfortable being quiet and thinking. But it helps me stay out of trouble.”

It’s a Question of Values

Exposing youth to environmental issues, plus giving them chance to learn the value of hard work is exactly why Johnson Controls, a member of the Detroit Youth Employment Consortium,got involved with SYEP.

In 2006, the Milwaukee-based company began its Conservation Leadership Corps (CLC) to teach urban youth environmental stewardship and leadership. The program has since expanded to two other cities where the company has operations: Baltimore and Detroit.

“We had 2,200 applicants for 110 positions in Detroit this summer,” said Jennifer Mattes, director of global public affairs. “We continue to search for additional funding sources in all three cities – the need is so great.”

In partnership with the national Student Conservation Association and the Greening of Detroit, the CLC was able to give Detroit youth a taste of the green job industry, including educating city residents about energy efficiency; weatherizing and energy auditing 75 homes in Detroit; designing and building an outdoor classroom and indoor environmental lab at Barbara Jordan Elementary School; conducting an extensive tree inventory; and reclaiming two green picnic shelters on Belle Isle using alternative building materials and practices.

Why did Johnson Controls get involved with summer youth programs?

“We wanted to invest in the communities where we do business,” said Mattes. “It’s about challenging the next generation to be environmental stewards and providing them the opportunity to gain leadership skills. Some of them may even become our employees. Plus, we hope they will stay in Detroit because they see a future there.” (For a list of other funders of the Detroit Conservation Leadership Corps, see below.*)

The program also helped Johnson Controls develop a relationship with state and local leaders. “The mayor and the governor are supportive of these summer programs as well,” said Mattes. “We’ve earned recognition as a company that’s engaging youth in a unique and meaningful employment experience that also provides a valuable community service.”
Mattes said that SYEP is a win-win for the business community. “Through the program, we can give youth a perspective of what kinds of skills and education they will need to be ready for the green jobs of the future,” she said. “At same time, they’re doing something to beautify their city. We want to make it a better place for everyone.”
* Johnson Controls is the founding sponsor of the Conservation Leadership Corps. Additional support was provided by: Chase; the City of Detroit Community Development Block Grant and Neighborhood Opportunity Fund; The City of Detroit Workforce Development Department; City Connect Detroit; the Michigan Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth; Michigan Works! Association; Masco Corporation Foundation; SAP Americas; and the Walmart Foundation.

An Excellent Resource For Article Marketing

By admin on

Article writing is without a doubt a confirmed means of generating traffic to your site. No hype here, it works, and it works well. After reading your appealing article, the reader clicks on your weblink in the last paragraph to learn more. Every article I have read about article marketing continues to be quite honest in stating that articles are a proven website traffic generator, that it will require work. If you’re a newbie, these tips have information that will get you off to the right start. If perhaps you’re an skilled article writer, let us look at the guidelines to find out the reason why the task requires a lot of work, and what we can certainly do to cut back the time required.

The 1st step is to create a helpful article on a particular subject. The short article needs to be over five-hundred words, due to the fact that is a requirement of most submittal web sites. Be sure to read the Submittal Guidelines of every web-site before submitting your unique article.

Next comes the preparation of a list of online sites to post your short article. The person who said “easier said than done” must have been a content article writer! The recognized guideline is to submit your content to at least 100 web-sites, however the more the better. Utilizing Internet resources I created a list of 100 internet sites, and yet as I checked them out the listing was quickly lessened to twenty-five. Many sites were no longer in operation, quite a few were not article submit internet sites, others were subject matter specific, not applicable to my topic, and other problems. Eventually, from a list of close to three hundred, I ultimately put together my initial list of one hundred sites to submit my article. This became a time-consuming project.

After that comes the actual publishing of your content to several article sites. This is rather clear-cut. Visiting a site initially will require being a member. This will require filling out a brief data form, perhaps submitting a photograph, activating your account from the authorization sent to your listed e-mail address. Subsequent logins to the web site are much quicker as you can go directly to Member Sign In and then to Submit Articles. Now it’s time to publish your unique article. Choose a Category, then cut and paste each component of your article from your word processor into the data input form on the site. Cut and paste the Title, Summary, Body, Resource Box, Bio info, and Keywords to the form on the site. Sounds easy, it is easy, however, a tedious time-consuming task.

Recognizing this as a very authentic situation, a considerable number of resourceful companies have come up with software to lessen the amount of time needed to publish a content article. No, I am not referring to Robot systems which are frowned upon. In reality, even if such methods were permitted would you really want the article that you just worked so hard on, submitted without viewing that it was done properly?

Here is where the article submitter software comes into play. These services let you distribute the articles you write to a huge selection of article submission sites and can easily save you an amazing amount of time in doing so. You just simply enter your article details into the software once, and then pick the directory you would like to distribute to. The system will then, instantly fill in all of the submission requirements for each directory and allow you to easily upload your unique content.

Try one of these systems, and take advantage of one of the best ways to upload unique articles and generate traffic to your site.

Exam A00-240 Sas Certified Statistical Business Analyst Using Sas 9 Regression And Model Credential

By admin on

The Statistical Business Specialist qualification is appropriate for professionals who fix business problems by doing statistical Analysis and predictive Model using SAS/STAT program.

SAS statistical program allows companies to understand from, implement, and improve on details acquired from wide stores of details. The SAS Certified Statistical Business Specialist Using SAS 9: Regression and Model qualification is designed for SAS professionals that use SAS/STAT program to execute and understand complex statistical details analysis. The qualification specializes in directly line and logistic regression methods used to make predictive styles. A thorough understanding of essential analysis is also important.

SAS Institution SAS Statistical Business Analysis SAS9: Regression and Model
The recommended preparing for the SAS Statistical Business Analysis Using SAS 9: Regression and Model evaluation are based on Analysis 1: Launch to ANOVA, Regression, and Logistic Regression and Predictive Model Using Logistic Regression applications. While no evaluation problems will be drawn the same from the applications or course exercises, these applications will provide candidates with a platform from which to implement the capabilities and details necessary for the evaluation. Experience is an essential factor to becoming a SAS Certified Professional.

Statistics 1: Launch to ANOVA, Regression, and Logistic Regression

This starting course is for SAS application customers who execute statistical Analysis using SAS/STAT application. The concentrate is on t assessments, ANOVA, and directly line regression, and has a brief guide to logistic regression. This course (or comparative knowledge) is a precondition to many of the programs in the statistical analysis program. A more innovative therapy of ANOVA and regression happens in the Analysis 2: ANOVA and Regression course. A more innovative therapy of logistic regression happens in the Specific Information Analysis Using Logistic Regression course and the Predictive Modeling Using Logistic Regression course.

Learn how to generate illustrative statistics and discover data with charts, perform analysis of difference and implement several evaluation methods, perform directly line regression and evaluate the presumptions, use regression model choice methods to aid in the choice of forecaster factors in several regression, use analytic statistics to evaluate statistical presumptions and recognize potential outliers in several regression, use chi-square statistics to recognize organizations among categorical factors and fit a several logistic regression model.

Predictive Modeling Using Logistic Regression

This course protects predictive modeling using SAS/STAT application with concentrate on the LOGISTIC process. This course also talks about choosing factors, evaluating styles, dealing with losing principles and using performance methods for large data places.

Learn how to use logistic regression to model an person’s actions as a operate of known information, create impact plots and possibilities rate plots using ODS Statistical Model, handle losing data principles, tackle multi co linearity in your predictors and assess model performance and evaluate styles.

Importance Of Race Relation Act Questionnaire Rr65 Demonstrated By Banco Santander Group

By admin on

The importance of the Race Relations Act Questionnaire RR65 is highlighted by the high-profile Chagger v Abbey National plc & Hopkins (2006) UK legal case, where the Employment Tribunal made a finding of race discrimination, which subsequently led to the record-breaking compensation award of 2.8 million. In 2006, Abbey National Santander Group (the Spanish-owned UK high street bank which will soon be re-branded as Santander, and is part of the Banco Santander Group) terminated Balbinder Chagger’s employment, giving redundancy as the reason. Mr Chagger believed, however, that the real reason behind his dismissal was race discrimination. Santander Abbey National Group employed Mr Chagger (who was of Indian origin) as a Trading Risk Controller and paid him about 100,000 per annum. He reported into Nigel Hopkins.

Employees who believe they have suffered race discrimination at work and are considering pursuing legal action may serve a Race Relations Act Questionnaire RR65 upon the employer. The Race Relations Act Questionnaire RR65 procedure is set out in the Race Relations Act (Questions and Replies) Order 1977.

The employee serves his questionnaire upon the employer via form RR65. It contains some standard questions, such as to what extend does the employer concur with the employee’s version of events, what is the employer’s version of events, and does the employer accept that the employee has suffered discrimination (and if not, then why not). The employee may attach his own specific questions to the end of the standard questions.

The serving of a Race Relations Act Questionnaire RR65 is not a necessary step in dealing with the discrimination via formal legal proceedings; it is optional. But, it is a step that gives the employee a unique chance to collect evidence in support of his case (because it permits the inclusion of questions of an exploratory nature), as well as, to obtain further information useful in deciding whether to proceed with legal action or not. Therefore, the employee should seriously consider serving a questionnaire, and design the questions to uncover evidence that proves race discrimination which is known only to the employer, uncover fully the employer’s case, and ascertain which facts are accepted by the employer and which are in dispute.

The employer must respond to the questionnaire in writing within a reasonable time period (8 weeks from the date the of receipt). The employer’s answers can be submitted as evidence before an Employment Tribunal. The employer does not have to answer the questionnaire, and cannot be ordered to respond to it by an Employment Tribunal. But, failure to respond within the time limit and/or ambiguous or evasive responses may be held against the employer. Where an Employment Tribunal believes the employer deliberately and without good reason did not respond within the time limit and/or the responses were evasive or ambiguous, the Race Relations Act 1976 allows the Employment Tribunal to draw any adverse inferences it considers just and equitable, including the inference that the employer committed an unlawful act of discrimination. Thus, an Employment Tribunal could make a finding of race discrimination based solely on the adverse inferences it has drawn regarding the questionnaire; although, in reality, it is unlikely to do that, it could decide to take a serious stance on the employer’s failure to respond properly and be persuaded by it, along with other evidence. The chance of the Employment Tribunal drawing adverse inferences will be increased if the employee had asked reasonable questions and had made efforts to chase the employer and encouraged it to respond properly. The employer will not know the consequences of its failures before it faces the Employment Tribunal, at which time it may be too late for the employer to make good any failings. Thus, an employee who avails himself of the questionnaire procedure automatically gains this tactical advantage.

Such was the situation Santander Abbey National had got itself into. The Employment Tribunal found that Abbey Santander had failed in answering Mr Chagger’s questionnaire. Mr Chagger had asked Santander Abbey National to supply details of legal actions of racial discrimination brought against it since 1 January 2001. Abbey Santander responded with 17 citations of incidents. In respect of 6 of them, dating from 2001 and 2002, Santander Abbey National simply stated that the outcomes of the actions were unknown and that it was unable to obtain information regarding the outcomes during the time period in which the questionnaire had to be responded to; no further answers were ever provided to Mr Chagger. The Employment Tribunal concluded that Santander Abbey National’s response was evasive. Its failure to answer the questionnaire, along with the other evidence in the case, satisfied the Employment Tribunal that Mr Hopkins and Abbey National Santander had discriminated against Mr Chagger on the grounds of race in his dismissal.

The serving of a Race Relations Act Questionnaire RR65 by the employee does not in itself start off any legal proceedings; the initiation of legal proceedings requires a separate procedure. If no legal proceedings are ever initiated, then the employee’s questionnaire and the employer’s responses remain a private matter between the employer and employee. If the employee is seriously contemplating legal action based on the other evidence that suggests race discrimination, then serving a Race Relations Act Questionnaire would be appropriate, because the employer’s response may help the employee to decide. But, if the employee does not have any serious intentions regarding legal action, then to serve a questionnaire would be inappropriate because doing so may unnecessarily vex the employer and/or the responses may affect the employee emotionally into pursuing a legal action he didn’t intend to pursue.

The Chagger v Abbey National plc & Hopkins case did not end at the Employment Tribunal stage. In 2008, it was appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). This year, 2009, the case was appealed to the Court of Appeal (being the second highest court in the land). The Court of Appeal’s List of Hearings showed that the appeal was heard on 7 and 8 July 2009. The Court’s records and judgement of the hearing were not available at the time of writing this article. The 11KBW set of barristers’ chambers had reported that the Court of Appeal hearing was only about compensation (not racial discrimination as well). So, this would seem to suggest that the wrong of race discrimination committed by Abbey National Santander and Nigel Hopkins has been settled by the EAT (it had upheld the original Employment Tribunal’s finding that Mr Hopkins and Santander Abbey National had discriminated against Mr Chagger on the grounds of race in his dismissal).