Organic Industry Watchdog FDA Food Safety Rules Threaten to Crush the Good Food Movement

September 19, 2013 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Mark Kastel, 608-625-2042

Organic Industry Watchdog: FDA Food Safety Rules Threaten to Crush the Good Food Movement

New Report Suggests Proposed Rules Could Drive the Nation’s Safest and Best Farmers Out of Business

http://www.cornucopia.org/2013/09/fda-food-safety-rules-threaten-crush-good-food-movement/ CORNUCOPIA, WI: After years of deliberation in Congress, interagency meetings, lobbyist activity, and a never-ending stream of food poisoning outbreaks, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is finally poised to implement the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA).

However, according to a just released white paper by The Cornucopia Institute at http://www.cornucopia.org/FoodSafety/, the FDA’s draft rules are so off the mark that they might economically crush the country’s safest farmers while ignoring the root threats to human health: manure contaminated with deadly infectious pathogens generated on “factory” livestock farms and high-risk produce-processing practices.

-In response to deadly outbreaks involving spinach, peanut butter and eggs, Congress acted decisively three years ago to pass the Food Safety Modernization Act,” said Mark A. Kastel, Codirector at The Cornucopia Institute, a farm policy research group based in Wisconsin. “Better oversight is needed but it looks like regulators and corporate agribusiness lobbyists are simultaneously using the FSMA to crush competition from the organic and local farming movement.”

Cornucopia’s report closely examines the FDA’s draft regulations (http://www.fda.gov/Food/guidanceregulation/FSMA/ucm334114.htm) for implementing the new food safety law, and a new FDA guidance (http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/Eggs/ucm360028) designed to control Salmonella in eggs produced by outdoor flocks. The report concludes that the new proposals would ensnare some of the country’s safest family farmers in costly and burdensome regulations in a misdirected attempt to rein in abuses that are mostly emanating from industrial-scale farms and giant agribusiness food-processing facilities.

Family farm advocates, and groups representing consumers interested in high-quality food, thought they had won a victory when the Tester/Hagan amendment was adopted by Congress exempting farmers doing less than $500,000 in business from the new rules. But Cornucopia’s report suggests the FDA seems more interested in a “one-size-fits-all” approach to food safety regulation.

In reality, the report suggests that small farms are not really exempt. The FDA is proposing that the agency can, without any due process, almost immediately force small farms to comply with the same expensive testing and record-keeping requirements as factory farms.

“In practical terms,” explains Judith McGeary, a member of The Cornucopia Institute’s policy advisory panel and Executive Director of the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance, “the FDA will be able to target small farms one-by-one and put them out of business, with little to no recourse for the farmers.”

The FDA’s economic analysis also shows that farms over $500,000 (still small in the produce industry) will be significantly impacted with some being driven out of business.

“The added expense and record-keeping time will potentially force many small and medium-sized local farms – owner-operated, selling at farmers markets directly to consumers or to local grocers and natural food co-ops – out of business,” Kastel added.

The Institute’s analysis points out that the FDA has wildly inflated the number of foodborne illnesses that originate from farm production (seed to harvest rather than contamination that occurs later in processing and distribution).

It also alleges that the FDA has failed to recognize that specific processed crops such as fresh-cut, or produce grown in certain regions are the genesis of 90% of dangerous outbreaks in fruits and vegetables. In addition to imports from countries like Mexico, where the most recent Taylor Farms Cyclospora outbreak (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/30/business/taylor-farms-big-food-supplier-grapples-with-frequent-recalls.html?_r=0) originated, the evidence indicates that fresh-cut bagged/boxed salad mix and greens, other pre-cut vegetables and sprouts are much more prone to contamination.

“The proposed rule is a mess,” said Daniel Cohen, owner of Maccabee Seed Company, a longtime industry observer. “The FDA has much greater expertise on food safety issues from harvest to the consumer, but focused instead on farming issues from planting to harvest. Limited, modest, and more focused steps to improve on-farm food-safety could have produced simple, affordable, effective, and enforceable regulation.”

According to Cornucopia, the most important lost opportunity in the collaborative process between Congress, the FDA and the USDA is the lack of attention directed at the giant concentrated animal feeding operations, or CAFOs (factory farms) raising livestock. The massive amount of manure stored at these factory farms is commonly tainted by highly infectious bacteria that have been polluting America’s air, water and farmlands.

“Federal regulators propose nothing to address sick livestock in animal factories and their pathogen-laden manure that is contaminating surrounding rural communities, nearby produce farms and our food supply,” Kastel lamented.

No More Organic Eggs?

The 2010 salmonella outbreak in eggs, centered in Iowa, shone a spotlight on industrial-scale egg houses confining thousands of hens in filthy and dangerous conditions.

The salmonella outbreak led to comprehensive regulation and new guidance for organic farmers. Organic farmers are required by federal law to provide outdoor access to their hens and the new FDA guidance, according to Cornucopia, materially undermines this management practice. And they are doing this despite scientific evidence tying higher rates of pathogenic contamination to older, massive factory farms with cages and forced molting (practices banned in organics) rather than raising birds outside.

“Their new guidance, on one hand, will make it difficult, expensive and maybe even impossible to have medium-sized flocks of birds outside,” Kastel stated. “At the same time, the FDA has colluded with the USDA’s National Organic Program to say that tiny ‘porches’, which hold only a minute fraction of the flock, will now legally constitute ‘outdoor access.’ This is a giveaway to conventional egg companies that are confining as many as 100,000 birds in a building and calling these ‘organic.'”

The Cornucopia Institute has publicly stated that they are investigating legal action against regulators if enforcement action is not taken, under the Organic Foods Production Act (http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/getfile?dDocName=STELPRDC50603700), against the large industrial operations confining laying hens and broilers indoors.

The issue of food safety in Washington has been a contentious one, causing rifts even between nonprofits representing the interest of consumers and family farm organizations that have been historically aligned in support of organic and local food. Some consumer advocates pressed for no exemptions, even as farm policy experts have supplied evidence indicating smaller, family-operated farms are inherently safer.

“Only an idiot would not be concerned with food safety,” said Tom Willey, a Madera, California, organic vegetable producer and longtime organic advocate.

Added Willey: “The antibiotic resistant and increasingly virulent organisms contaminating produce, from time to time, are mutant creatures introduced into the larger environment from confined industrial animal operations across the American countryside. The FDA’s misguided approach could derail achievements in biological agriculture and a greater promise of food made safe through respect for and cooperation with the microbial community which owns and operates this planet upon which we are merely guests.”

-30-

The Cornucopia Institute is a nonprofit organization engaged in research and educational activities supporting the ecological principles and economic wisdom underlying sustainable and organic agriculture. Through research and investigations on agricultural and food issues, The Cornucopia Institute provides needed information to family farmers, consumers, stakeholders involved in the good food movement, and the media.

Panasonic Enters Into Supply Agreement With Tesla Motors To Supply Automotive

If the laptop is the built-in optical drive, you generally use the IDE interface, if it is external, then there are USB, PC Card, IEEE1394, and four special interface. Which is the general level of the best USB interface, but not all USB drives can boot laptop, the best way is the actual experiment. There are several criteria that will be able to boot USB plug-in optical drive, such as IBM Slim USB CD-ROM, but the price is not cheap:). Note that: USB interface, CD-ROM boot, can only be used to install Windows XP, Windows XP if the previous operating system (such as Windows 2000, and 98, ME), may be found in the boot drive, you must use special The boot image can burn a disc,
Laptop PANASONIC CF-30 Battery generally support network boot, of course, some domestic models (such as most of the SONY machine) do not support, if it is supported by the machine, press F12 at startup can display Network Boot, as long as your network environment supports network boot ( For example, install a version of Windows2000 Server with Terminal Services), you can use this option.
To prevent dust pollution, notebook drives should be removed when not in use the disc tray closed, but be careful not to use too much low-quality discs.
When the notebook computer when the drive head with dust, you should use a special detergent to clean the head, it is not the time, you can … … can use a little saliva (remember to brush our teeth, do what the saliva inside with rice … … ha ha) and a cotton swab to clean, the effect is also very good. Laptop optical drive tray out of the sides with the guide, if too much force when loading the disc, much easier to increase the number of rail and tray wear,
Long placed the notebook computer batteries, customers need not worry will lead to shortened battery life. When the battery charge to 100%, the charge control chips (FET) will stop charging the battery. Subsequently, the battery power will be reduced in the course of nature. When the battery down to 95%, FET will re-trickle charge the battery until the battery back to 100%. This product is designed to extend the natural life of the battery, so keep the PANASONIC CF-31 Battery placed in the notebook computer does not affect the battery’s natural life. Pull down is also possible to use you, but remember to pray Do not plug power with the kick off, oh.
It is a powerful endorsement of our technology that Panasonic, the worlds leading battery cell manufacturer, has chosen to partner with Tesla to advance electric vehicle performance and value, said Tesla Co-Founder and CEO Elon Musk. Incorporating Panasonics next-generation cells into Model S batteries will ensure unrivaled range and performance. We are very grateful for our great partnership with Panasonic.
Panasonic will supply lithium ion cells for EVs that can achieve longer range with large energy density. It is our pleasure to start supplying the cells for Teslas Model S and promote sustainable mobility, said Masato Ito, President, Energy Company of Panasonic Corporation.
Tesla is a supplier of batteries and powertrains to Toyota and Daimler. Tesla is a comprehensive electric vehicle powertrain component supplier to the electric vehicle industry.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this press release, including statements regarding vehicle cost, margin targets and range and performance metrics for Model S, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on managements current expectations, and as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those projected. Various important factors, such as the following, could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements: finalization of pricing and costs from suppliers, consumer demand for electric vehicles; achieving expected results from powertrain PANASONIC CF-53 Battery systems as well as the risks and uncertainties identified under the sections captioned Risk Factors and MD&A in Teslas Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 12, 2011. Tesla disclaims any obligation to update information contained in these forward-looking statements.

Auto Repair Shops – Scheduling Software To Improve Customer Service

Everyone is doing now doing almost anything online, as long as the necessary action does not require a physical presence. It is ideal for situations that require an exchange in information, and in the digital age, all information can simply be transferred to the digital format.

Online appointment scheduling can be a benefit to almost any business, including an automotive service and repair business. Automobile owners have become accustomed to having their autos checked periodically. We know that it necessary for proper maintenance and to extend the life of the automobile. The customary way of doing this, is usually to call the automotive service and repair shop, or the location where your vehicle is serviced and book and appointment. You may be fortunate enough to get an appropriate time in which to bring in the vehicle, but many times you may be forced to re-arrange your schedule, without knowing that your vehicle may be unavailable for a certain period.

There is now a way to avoid these inconveniences. Your automotive service and repair shop should have on online appointment and scheduling system. We are now in an age where anyone can be easily connected to the internet. Experts predict that in the coming years, being always online will become a natural part of being alive. Just as we need to continue breathing in air in order to live, we will need to be connected to the internet. The web can now be accessed from anywhere, from boats, planes, trains, autos, and the number of mobile devices that can access the web far exceeds desktop computers. Cheaper prices for bandwidth, and lower prices for electronic products including smartphones and tablets, bring accessibility to everyone. More appliances, and even clothing, will be enabled with access to the web in the very near future.

This means that customers will need fast and easy access to do things like booking appointments for automotive service and repair. The process is simple. You go online and reserve a required time, and get immediate confirmation. You can then re-arrange your other activities with some degree of confidence.

There are multiple benefits in the process, not only for the customer, but also for the business owner, who can then build a very valuable asset of a database of customers. Business owners can fully realize that it can cost up to 8 times as much to obtain new clients than it is to obtain new ones, and with a much valued client database, it can easily be more cost effective to maintain a business with existing customers. These clients can be contacted and notified of special deals or promotions.

It can also be done, by reading Quick Response codes that will re-direct the user to the Online Scheduling application, where the data can be entered. Manual transfer of information which is often accompanied by the opportunity for mistakes is eliminated. The process is secure, as it is now a legal requirement for all sensitive data to be encrypted. The software can even be integrated with your social networking accounts, such as Twitter and Facebook. More businesses of varying sizes are quickly appreciating the benefits that are realized with online scheduling and appointment software.

Half Year Report-construction Machinery Industry Overview

www.cri-report.com – In January-June 2011, China’s construction machinery industry accumulatively achieved the total industrial output value of CNY 312.35 billion, ascending by 43.04% YOY, and realized the sales revenue of CNY 306.13 billion, increasing by 40.86% YOY.

In 2011 H1, the accumulative product output of China’s construction machinery industry continued growing. Except for special cement equipment whose output experienced substantial year-on-year decline, other products all maintained growth, especially for internal combustion folk lift products.

After China’s construction machinery market experienced the rapid growth in 2011 Q1, various sub-industries have seen an obvious decline in sales volume since April compared with March. In January-May 2011, the accumulative sales volume of excavators in China grew by 36% YOY; that of bulldozers grew by 21% YOY; that of loaders grew by 21% YOY. It has been an indisputable fact that the construction machinery industry has slowed down.

Although China’s construction machinery industry still has favorable prospects in 2011, the decline in growth rate is an inevitable trend. The main reason for the decline in prosperity of some products in the industry lies in credit crunch, whose influence on the industry is mainly reflected in 2 aspects: first, the downstream demand of the industry will be influenced. Construction of some projects under construction has decelerated due to credit crunch, and operation of projects which were originally planned to be operated has been delayed; second, the marketing efforts of enterprises will be influenced. In 2011 Q1, various construction machinery enterprises successively made more marketing efforts and increased the proportions of financial leasing and installment payment so as to seize market shares. Since April, some enterprises have enhanced risk control and decreased the proportion of credit sales.

In 2011, the global economy recovered gradually and the demand for construction machinery increased. The external demand will still grow, directly driving the construction machinery export market especially for the construction engineering machinery manufacturing industry. Although the base of global economic recovery is unstable, the situation of favorable global economy will be unchanged in 2011. The export environment of China’s construction machinery will continue improving and the export value is predicted to be resumed to the record high of 2008.

To get more details, please go to http://www.cri-report.com/278-chinese-construction-industry-report-2011h1.html

More following information can be acquired from this report:
-Operations of China’s Construction Machinery Industry, 2011 H1
-Operations of Sub-industries of China’s Construction Machinery Industry, 2011 H1
-Import and Export of China’s Construction Machinery, 2011 H1
-Prediction on Development of China’s Construction Machinery Industry, 2011 H2

Is Direct To Garment Worth The Investment

In these economic times it is even more important to make prudent investments. Over the past 6 years the direct to garment industry has exploded and with it screen printers, embroiders, and entrepreneurs have asked is Direct to Garment worth the investment? And the answer is it depends. Like most investments it is not ideally suited for every investor. Most see it as a shiny new toy and are taken by its technology. This may be all well and good but that shinny new investment may be nothing more than 200lb paper weight if not utilized. Before we consider which model or manufacturer might be right for you lets first consider if you should even be looking at one.

Most Direct to Garment Printers are not designed to print large volume jobs. A print on a dark colored garment will take most Direct to Garment Printers 2-10 minutes to produce depending on printer speed and image size. This does not include pretreatment or heat pressing. You can probable count on doing between 6-15 dark colored garments per hour. This is not a lot when you consider a manual screen printer could do a similar job and produce between 30-60 per hour and an automatic printer could produce upwards of 300 shirts per hour. So if you are doing larger jobs on average then screen printing may be a better investment. Also, screen printing is better for special effects printing such as high density, glow in the dark, puff, special bases, glitters, and shimmers. With Direct to Garment you are dealing with usually five colors (white, black, cyan, magenta, and yellow). The white is used to underbase and the other colors are used to render a process image. This is the good and the bad. The image comes out just like the image on your home ink jet printer. However, you can’t hit some colors because they are beyond the color gamut of process printing. So make sure your clients are not incredibly picky about getting exact Pantone matches. If they are picky then you may not be able to satisfy them.

So if it is so limited then why would you invest in one. You should invest in one if you have the right type of market for one. If you are printing smaller runs that include multiple colors you may be ideal for this type of equipment. Screen Printers have a larger set-up cost and smaller runs are not as advantageous for them. A 5 or 10 shirt run is going to cost them the same as 100 or 200 shirt run to set-up. Also, a Direct to Garment machine costs virtually the same to run whether it is a one color or four color job. Screen Printers have to compensate for more colors as each color will add time to the run. Smaller run reprints are also cost effective on a Direct to Garment Machine.

The other part of the equation is you need to have a business plan for what you are doing. Too many companies and individuals enter the Direct to Garment business without an understanding of their own customers. Customer base is a large factor in whether or not it is worth investing in a Direct to Garment Machine. If you don’t know who your customers are then you need to create a business plan and envision exactly who your customers are and how they are going to get to you. If you are unsure then you might want to invest in a heat press and do transfers to start with. It will be more cost effective in the short term. If you know that you are going to do smaller runs with photo quality images than Direct to Garment may be right for you.

The other part of the equation is that people under estimate how they are going to get customers. In order to make your investment pay off you need a plan to get customers. Direct to Garment Machines are expensive 12 to 250 thousand dollars. Most run in the range of 15-25 thousand dollars. A manual Screen Printing set-up is around 8-16 thousand dollars and a Sublimation set-up is 2-5 thousand dollars. So if you are going to go with a Direct to Garment set-up make sure this is your market or you will be spending unnecessary funds.

The other thing to consider about Direct to Garment is how comfortable you are with technology and fixing things. The reason I say this is because you will better off having a graphics background. Familiarity with Photoshop, Corel Draw, Illustrator will increase your likelihood of success. It will also make it easier to understand the RIP and any other graphic software that may come with the machine. Some of the people that have struggled with the Direct to Garment Technology have struggled on the software side. I bring up being comfortable with fixing things is because if you are handy it will help you avoid expensive service calls. Which brings up one of the big reasons people give for giving up on Direct to Garment ‘ mechanical trouble with the machines. Now there are definitely some machines that are more problematic then others but that doesn’t excuse you from taking care of your investment. Some machines require a lot of maintenance others just some but they all do require some preventative maintenance. Understanding this is one the keys to being successful in Direct to Garment. Another thing to consider is environment. Keeping a clean environment with the proper humidity is essential. When we began dealing with Direct to Garment machines we used to have to replace print heads every 2-3 months. Once we added a humidifier to our room to keep the proper humidity we never lost another print head. It was night and day and the prints came out better and more vibrant with a properly maintained print head. So make sure wherever you are putting your Direct to Garment Machine you have the proper environment.

So if you are going into the Direct to Garment market please make sure you have your business plan ready. Make sure you have the right customers and you know how you are going to reach them. Also, make sure you have the right environment and you feel comfortable with the technology. Direct to Garment is worth the investment for those with the right business plan.