Jobs Abroad For Couples

Finding the right person takes really hard work. People usually go through a lot of disappointing experiences before they actually get to find the right person for them. Though this is not always the case, most people are really thankful for finally meeting someone they can really connect with. Whatever your story might be, having a successful relationship must be something you are really grateful for, as most people are. However, having a relationship sometimes implies a little work.

First of all, you have to change everything about the way you view things, as I suddenly becomes We. Although that might sound pretty romantic at first, when it comes to more serious decisions in life, that We can sometimes get in the way. Though that might sound awful, most people have to face this situation at least once in their life. For example, if you happen to have a job opportunity that requires some personal sacrifice, you might not be able to take it because you are in a relationship.

How do you include We in every part of your life? Nobody wants to be selfish, but most people end up facing contradictory situations once in a while. On one hand, you need to turn down a job offer that might have presented a great opportunity for your career without hesitation, but on the other hand, you need to think about your future and make your own decision as a person. Nobody wants to regret the decisions they have made because of their partner, as that can be really unhealthy for a relationship.

So, how do you get these sort of situations solved without breaking up the relationship? I mean, you don`t want your relationship to get in the way of your carrier, but you also don`t want your carrier to get in the way of your relationship. The best way to deal with them would be to somehow get them together. If you find a way to make the two parts of your life work together, than you can fully enjoy both of them.

A great way of getting your partner involved on your professional activity is to find a couple job. There is a high demand for couples abroad that work different jobs together. Some couples join different cruises, others go abroad and get different jobs, while others consider being English teachers abroad. Going abroad and working there as a couple can not only guarantee you financial well being, but will also bring you as a couple together.

You will have the opportunity to travel and discover new places together and you will have the same carrier as a common ground. Working for the same goal can bring two people very closely together. Also, being foreigners in another country can do wonders for your connection as a couple. You will be able to really be yourselves, as you will have no one but strangers around you. Why let carriers destroy your relationship, when you can have them work magic on it?

Let An Employment Attorney Help Your Business Maintain Legitimate Practices

When you are working to expand your small business, it is important to remember that you must always grant employees the rights they are supposed to be afforded under the guise of state and federal laws. In some cases, employers may not even know that they are violating laws or infringing on a person’s rights. Sometimes, they are just trying to be nice or make things easier for both the company and the employee. These mistakes or lapses in judgment can be quite costly.

If you are making a lot of changes or bringing a new group of people onto the team, it is a good idea to consult with an employment attorney. One of these legal professionals can review your new policies and ensure you are doing everything in exactly the right way. The following are a few policies that you should ensure are in place that your attorney will be able to explain to you.

State laws require that employees give their workers 30-minute lunch breaks and other short breaks during the day, depending upon how long a person works at any given time. You cannot deny your workers these breaks or encourage them to skip them. If you do, you could get sued over the matter. It is up to managers and human resource officers to make sure that all of your employees understand the break system. This ensures that everyone knows how to use their time appropriately.

It is also important to know when you should be providing overtime pay and to whom. It is unlawful to let workers put in a certain amount of hours per day or per week without giving them overtime pay. Consult with your company’s employment attorney if you are unsure of what the law states and how it pertains to your operation. If you continue to let someone work without adequate pay, you might eventually have to provide back-pay and deal with certain penalties.

The aforementioned policies are just a couple of the ones you should review with an employment attorney. Others that are important involve termination, confidentiality agreements, vacation time, and harassment. If an employee can show that you or one of your other employees has treated them unfairly with regards to one of these policies, you could have a lot of legal woes to deal with in the very near future. It’s better to get sound advice from your employment attorney before a problem ever arises, rather than trying to work through court proceedings.

For information on how to get help from an employment attorney, Portland, Oregon businesses can consult with a legal representative from Bullard Law. For more information, visit: http://bullardlaw.com.

Early Retirement Of Baby Boomers Is The Cure For High Unemployment

The Federal Government Should Offer Early Retirement to Baby Boomers
by Spencer Holly, AngryCalifornian

Our current high unemployment rates are not due to lack of jobs, but, rather, to the fact that our employed workforce is too large, thanks, in part, to the Baby Boomer generation that is not ready to retire.

There are two basic ways to reduce unemployment. One, the conventional solution, is to increase the number of jobs available by somehow creating more jobs, and two, to somehow reduce the total number of currently employed workers in viable jobs; jobs that will need replacement workers. Either one, or a combination, will reduce the unemployment rate.

Creating jobs is good, but it takes too long; it takes many years, and there is no guarantee that there will ever be enough jobs.

Reducing the number of currently employed workers is never considered because, on its surface, it doesnt make sense because reducing the number of employed workers should mean that there is an increase in unemployed workers and the unemployment rate. But that is only true if the no longer employed worker needs to collect unemployment benefits, and seeks new employment.

If the not-employed workers did not collect benefits, and did not need to seek new employment, the effect would be to create new job openings. It is a mathematical fact that when employed workers drop out of the workforce, the unemployment rate must decrease

So, we need to reduce the employed workforce in order to reduce unemployment.

Obviously, we cannot reduce the workforce by decree, or by force. We want individuals to voluntarily leave their jobs, and drop out of the workforce. A simple, and effective way to induce workers to voluntarily vacate their jobs, and not collect unemployment payments, and not need to seek new employment, would be to offer early retirement to certain, older, individuals who are already near retirement, but are still holding on to their jobs until they reach age 65.

Under current Social Security rules, an individual may now retire at age 62, however, their benefits, and the monthly amount they receive is much less than if they wait until they reach the age of 65. We could induce older workers to retire early by offering them full Social Security benefits at age 62, instead of age 65, and effectively reduce the unemployment rate.

We would probably create more than one position per retiring individual, because older/experienced workers often possess knowledge and skills that make them efficient workers who are able to do the work of more than one inexperienced individual. It could easily take two or more new employees to handle the duties of a single retiring employee.

Employers would like this because it would reduce their payroll costs; they would be shedding the higher paid individuals in favor of lower paid individuals, and could quite possibly hire more than one new employee per retiring employee. And they could also see a reduction in their health insurance costs, and their workers compensation costs, because the younger workforce is healthier.

Instead of collecting unemployment payments, the now employed individuals would be paying income tax, and SSI & Medicare, etc.

And lets face it. The people who spend the most money in our culture are the young people with families to feed, and cloth, and house, etc, etc. The older crowd is through with that; quite possibly, their houses are paid for, and their kids our out of college, etc. They are spending their discretionary money on medications, and recreation, and vacations.

=============================================

Of course, there is an extra expense involved in paying the extra retirement monies, but that may be more than offset by the savings in not having to pay unemployment benefits, and the additional tax revenues paid by the hired workers, and the greater ripple effect their monies would have on the overall economy. (Employed people spend money and support the employment of other individuals).

From a quick search of the internet I found that during the first three years of the Baby Boomer generation, 1946, 1947, and 1948, there were an average of 3.66 million births EACH YEAR, in the U.S, for a total of about 11 million births.

Since the first baby boomers turned 62 in 2008, if all of those individuals were allowed to retire early, right now, we would create 3.66 million job openings, immediately, and then another 3.66 million jobs for EACH of the next two years.

(These are obviously high estimates, because, many of those born in those years surely have died already, and there may be some who won’t want to retire early).

According to current stats, there have been 3.6 million jobs lost in nonfarm occupations, since Dec of 2007.

(That number is certainly much higher, at this time).By changing the current retirement rules, we would almost immediately nullify all the jobs lost so far, and create up to an additional 3.66 million jobs for each subsequent year.

======================================

I don’t really know the true cost of allowing individuals to retire early, but let’s say, for the sake of argument, that it costs an average of an additional $ 20,000 per year per individual, which is probably conservative. Remember, this additional amount is only a burden for three years per individual retiree, if they choose to retire at age 62. After that, at age 65, the additional amount would no longer be additional, but would be the normal amounts dues at age 65.

At $ 20,000 per individual, if 3.66 million additional people retire early each year, the total additional annual cost is 73.2 billion dollars.

From that 73.2 billion dollars, we need to deduct the savings in unemployment payments, because formerly unemployed people would now be employed.

We would lose the tax formerly received from the retiring individuals, but that would be offset by the employees who are now employed, and paying taxes. Plus we would gain much more revenue from the ripple effect of having more, and younger, people employed.

That 73.2 billion is a huge amount of money, but, we’ve reduced unemployment by 3.66 million people, and if those formerly unemployed, now employed, individuals pay ONLY $ 3,000.00 per year in Federal income taxes, SSI, etc, the total is 11 BILLION dollars PER YEAR, off the top.

We have already wasted 100s of billions of dollars on programs, such as the 700+ billion dollar TARP, that have not created a single job, so why not spend a fraction of that amount on a program that will actually work, and will actually create job openings, and reduce unemployment ?

If the early retirement program were in effect for just a few years, say 2008, 2009,2010, 2011, and assuming the program actually begins in 2009:

If we had this program in effect for the next three years, beginning in 2009, the maximum cost would be about 658.6 billion dollars:

Turned………………Cost……..Cost…….Cost…….Cost
Age 62………………2008…….2009…….2010…….2011
———-………………——-……..——-…….——–……——

2008…………………000………73.2……..73.2……..73.2
2009…………………000………73.2……..73.2……..73.2
2010…………………000……….000……..73.2……..73.2
2011…………………000……….000………000……..73.2
……………………….——………——……..——…….——–

Total…………………………….146.2…….219.6……292.8…..=……658.6 billion dollars

In reality, each year would be much less that 73.2 billion because the individuals would not be eligible to retire until they have attained the age of 62, which, for the population, would be distributed over the whole year.

In terms of jobs created, we could create almost 33 million job openings:

Turned………..Jobs……….Jobs………..Jobs………..Jobs
Age 62……….2008……….2009………..2010………..2011
———-……….——-……….——–……….——-………..——-

2008………….0000……….3.66…………3.66…………3.66
2009………….0000……….3.66…………3.66…………3.66
2010………….0000……….0000………..3.66…………3.66
2011………….0000……….0000………..0000………..3.66
………………..——-……….——-………..——-………..——-

Total………………………….7.32……….10.98………..14.64….=….32.92 million jobs

=======================================================

In a couple years, we could actually have a labor shortage, and wages would be forced up, and, hence, tax revenues would also increase.

Even if my figures are off by 50%, we’ve still created 3.66 million jobs immediately, and 12.8 million
more job openings in subsequent years.

Another plus, is that the retired individuals are not going to live forever, and their numbers will decrease steadily with each year, decreasing the over all cost.

On it’s surface, this kind sounds like a crack-pot idea, but……. maybe it wouldn’t hurt to do some serious number crunching on this one…

And that is just my opinion.

Spencer Holly, AngryCalifornian
AC20090515007
===================

Employment Lawyer He can Protect Workers’ Rights

The relationship between a worker and their employer can be a wonderful arrangement. It can also be fraught with unfair treatment that needs the attention of an employment lawyer. While many employers are just as upstanding and hard working as their workers, there are some that are so focused on the bottom line that they infringe on the rights of their employees. Some of the issues that such lawyers can help with include:

Sexual Discrimination: It is illegal to be discriminated against in the employment arena due to gender. Age Discrimination: An adult person’s age cannot be used to determine wages or job availability. If a person can do the work, it doesn’t legally matter how old they are. This, of course, is not true for minors. Minors under the age of eighteen years of age may only work under specified conditions and hours.

Sexual Harassment: A person may not be harassed sexually during the course of their employment. This covers a broad spectrum including intimidation, insults or derogatory language.

Pregnancy Discrimination: Each employer must adhere to legal guidelines in regards to pregnant employees. Pregnancy is never a reason to engage in discriminatory practices.

Wrongful Termination: A proper course of action must be adhered to in the termination of an employee. Wrongful termination is a cause for legal intervention. Problems Related to Severance Packages: Issues do arise regarding severance packages. Issues may include what is rightfully owed to the employee and how the package will be distributed.

Disability Discrimination: A person can not be discriminated against because of disability limitations. Legal intervention is necessary if this type of discrimination should occur.

Race Discrimination: A person’s race has no bearing on their ability to carry out their job. Using race as a deciding factor in job selection or wages is illegal. Problems with Contract Negotiations: Employment lawyers can help with individual contract issues as well as broad scale company or union negotiations. Problems Related to Family Leave Issues: A certain amount of family leave is a person’s right. If problems occur, legal guidance may become necessary.

If legal issues come up within a workplace environment, it is important to have an attorney step in. Workers, like all citizens, have rights to be treated fairly and without harassment or harmful discrimination. They also have the right to work in a safe environment. If an employee finds that this is not the case where they work, they should consult with an employment lawyer as soon as possible.

An employment lawyer, Media PA specializes in employment law cases and is eager to help you resolve your dilemma, so you can continue to work. Firms here provide top-notch legal protection and legal counsel for those in need of an employment lawyer. To know more, visit http://www.benarilawfirm.com

Best Legal Advice Warranted For Employment Tribunals

Many states are coming up with their independent employment tribunals as part of rapid dealing with cases related to jobs and such circumstances. Tribunals have been resorted to by many governments, both at the local centres and also at the state levels. These are courts which deal with matters of governance and of civil nature, but mostly their functions are to hear out cases which can be dealt without having a jury or long trials. Tribunals are usually meant to expedite civil cases, which are concerned with administrative matters. Judges sitting in chair in employment tribunals are either specially deputed from the regular courts or have special expertise in administrative cases.

Whenever employment related issues are to be brought into the court of law, it is seen that tribunals are the best places to go because the final word can be received quickly. If an applicant is not satisfied with the results, then the case can be taken to the higher levels. But if things are alright for them, then it is very easy and even productive to start at the very beginning. Since special cases are only heard in these tribunals, not every lawyer or solicitor would be able to handle the cases.

Further, general public is totally unaware about the proceedings inside the court room. For this reason, legal advice is highly essential whenever matters of employment are brought before the employment tribunals. Lawyers can be contacted when these kinds of cases are forthcoming. People can approach solicitors of repute, who have been handling the cases and have the necessary expertise to give them legal advice. Many people are there, who are not in the knowledge of such specialised lawyers.

To get more information on them, people should ask about in the court or their lawyer friends to suggest the name of the right solicitors for them. With the right kind of advice on legal matters, clients can be sure of getting a reprieve in their cases, or at best they will have a proper representation in the court of law. During any problem that arises in case of employment or in offices or work related environment, aggrieved persons can go for the employment tribunals, through the employment lawyers or solicitors.

It has become customary nowadays, much because of the fact that people are becoming aware about their rights and also because there are plenty of experts who can provide legal advice on matters related exactly to employment. These are people who have had specialisation of employment and labour laws in their courses or have been practising the same in courts for many years now. Taking advice about matters pertaining to employment tribunals is therefore the usual method to start of a case these days, so much so that employment related lawyers are beginning to go for these features by getting the proper mileage and advertisement.