Pallet truck scale – innovation through technology

Technology and innovation go hand in hand. Although innovation preceded technology as we know it, by a very long time, it would now appear as though each is the driving force behind the other. As technology advances new opportunities to innovate emerge and as innovations take place ultimately a new technical approach sometimes reveals itself.

A pallet truck scale is innovation working for you. With the arrival of a digital scale it became possible to have a light and compact weighing system that could easily be mounted on a pallet truck. This meant that the object to be weighed did not need to be placed on the platform of a weighing scale to just record the weight. The weight could now be recorded as the object was being moved on the pallet truck. Since the movement was required in any case it was now no longer necessary to have a separate routine to weigh the object. And this innovative idea led to saving time and effort that would have been required for the special procedure of placing the object on a weighing scale to record the weight.

A great innovation is one that pays for its cost easily by giving significant savings that are realized in a relatively short period of time. Therefore even if the legacy weighing scale is still in a good condition investing a pallet truck scale makes sense because the savings that will result will justify the expense.

A great innovation gives some obvious benefits and some not so obvious ones which you will realize when you will starting using pallet truck scales for your operations. For example not only do you save on time and effort you also save on space because now you will not need a separate area where a scale can be placed and the weight of the objects be measured.

Pallet truck scales are available in a wide range and you should be able to find one that matches your needs. Since digital scales have been around for a long time they have now proven themselves to be rugged and capable of delivering a great performance over a long period of time. You can see the latest pallet truck scales at www.paylessscales.com.

About Author :

Lawrence has been in the weighing machines industry for the last 14 years. He has been interested in the penetration of digital scales across various market segments. His special area of interest has been maximizing the value proposition of a digital scale. You can know about pallet truck scales & other digital scales at www.paylessscales.com.

Aarkstore Enterprise Tesla Motors, Inc. (TSLA) – Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review

Tesla Motors, Inc. (Tesla) is an manufacturer of electric vehicles. The company is principally engaged in the development and production of battery electric vehicles. Tesla is focused on developing newly designed, high performance and energy efficient electric vehicles. The company’s primary product Tesla Roadster is an all-electric sports car incorporated with advanced lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery pack. It is a combination top speed, high acceleration and less operating cost. The company is currently developing a new sedan car which is named as White Star. Tesla has design and assembly facilities in England and motor production facilities in Taiwan. The company owns and operates retail outlets in Menlo Park and West Los Angles. Tesla is currently planning to open seven regional sales and service centers to establish a coast-to-coast network in the US and Europe. The company has strong network of representatives and suppliers across the world. Tesla is headquartered at San Carlos, California, the US.

Tesla Motors, Inc. Key Recent Developments. . .

Feb 10, 2011: Tesla Opens New Showroom At Washington, D.C. Jan 27, 2011: Tesla Launches Battery Recycling Program Throughout Europe Jan 11, 2011: Tesla Roadster Receives Approval For Australian Roads Jan 10, 2011: Tesla’s Model S On Display In Detroit Nov 11, 2010: Tesla-Toyota Motor RAV4 EV Concept To Debut At Los Angeles Auto Show

This comprehensive SWOT profile of Tesla Motors, Inc. provides you an in-depth strategic analysis of the company’s businesses and operations. The profile has been compiled to bring to you a clear and an unbiased view of the company’s key strengths and weaknesses and the potential opportunities and threats. The profile helps you formulate strategies that augment your business by enabling you to understand your partners, customers and competitors better.

This company report forms part of -Profile on Demand’ service, covering over 50,000 of the world’s leading companies. Once purchased, highly qualified team of company analysts will comprehensively research and author a full financial and strategic analysis of Tesla Motors, Inc. including a detailed SWOT analysis, and deliver this direct to you in pdf format within two business days. (excluding weekends).

The profile contains critical company information including*,

– Business description – A detailed description of the company’s operations and business divisions. – Corporate strategy – Analyst’s summarization of the company’s business strategy. – SWOT Analysis – A detailed analysis of the company’s strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats. – Company history – Progression of key events associated with the company. – Major products and services – A list of major products, services and brands of the company. – Key competitors – A list of key competitors to the company. – Key employees – A list of the key executives of the company. – Executive biographies – A brief summary of the executives’ employment history. – Key operational heads – A list of personnel heading key departments/functions. – Important locations and subsidiaries – A list and contact details of key locations and subsidiaries of the company. – Detailed financial ratios for the past five years – The latest financial ratios derived from the annual financial statements published by the company with 5 years history. – Interim ratios for the last five interim periods – The latest financial ratios derived from the quarterly/semi-annual financial statements published by the company for 5 interims history.

Note*: Some sections may be missing if data is unavailable for the company.

Key benefits of buying this profile include,

You get detailed information about the company and its operations to identify potential customers and suppliers. – The profile analyzes the company’s business structure, operations, major products and services, prospects, locations and subsidiaries, key executives and their biographies and key competitors.

Understand and respond to your competitors’ business structure and strategies, and capitalize on their weaknesses. Stay up to date on the major developments affecting the company. – The company’s core strengths and weaknesses and areas of development or decline are analyzed and presented in the profile objectively. Recent developments in the company covered in the profile help you track important events.

For more information, please visit:

http://www.aarkstore.com/reports/Tesla-Motors-Inc-TSLA-Financial-and-Strategic-SWOT-Analysis-Review-104013.html

Or email us at or call +919272852585

The only laudable weight loss clinic is California medical management

Shining in the crowd of weight loss clinics is one clinic that has acquired credibility by transforming the bodies of many weight losing aspirants by its exclusive techniques and methods. This wonderful weight loss clinic is called California medical weight management and has proved to be a Godsend for the over weighted Californians.

California medical weight management is run by highly qualified as well as greatly professional physicians who own a set of techniques through which they let the aspirants lose weight quickly and gain health simultaneously. This process of losing yet gaining is what separates this excellent clinic from the rest of the weight loss clinics. The doctors at California medical weight management aims at snatching the extra weight from the aspirants and showering healthy nutrients plus fitness on them. The process of achieving that aim involves examination of the body, drafting of a schedule based on examination and implementation of that routine. The routine consists of exercises, health supplements, a diet plan and medications for the aspirant. The execution of this schedule starts bringing fitness to the body and cutting the unwanted dancing flab off your body. In a matter of few weeks, California medical weight management will convert your body into a perfect one, from the inside as well as outside.

California medical weight management is glad to have everybody’s faith in it and hence have been successful and providing the best to its aspirants. Blessed with highly professional doctors, the clinic is located at San Ramon and Watsonville.

Author:-
Nicolas Bell is a famous author for health related articles. He has written many articles on weight Loss, quick weight loss, weight management, weight control, BMI Calculator and many more.

Various Advantages Of Email Marketing Japan

There are many benefits that you can enjoy with selecting e-mail marketing japan for your organization.

Are you not using the best technique that most of the businesses are doing and that is e-mail marketing Japan? In that situation, you are certainly missing a lot of things. These are nothing but the opportunity to increase the sales and also expand the business. There are a lot of businesses that have considered this option of marketing. Why are you left behind then? Opt for this option of marketing and then notice the change that your organization comes across. One aspect that you should keep in your mind is that once you begin this you will notice drastic change in the working of your business activities.

Are you not aware of what exactly email marketing is then here it goes. e-mail marketing japan is a commercial message to group of people. This means that you can send out emails to a group of people that contains information about your company. You can even send ads, request business, solicit sales and also send discount cards and many more things. The reason behind this is that in this way you can certainly build loyalty and also trust among the target audience and the present clients.

One among the most vital benefits of using the email marketing japan is that it is a reasonable marketing technique. This means that you do not have to spend more money in marketing strategy. This technique is considered to be one among the most affordable and effective ones. This marketing method is not only reasonable but faster as well. This certainly does not mean that you get results in just a couple of days, but when you compare it with other traditional methods you can certainly get quicker results.

The next benefit of using this type of technique is that the return on the investment is easily tracked and hence when you are carrying the method track record will increase.

With the other kinds of marketing techniques, it is not possible to reach out to many people, but with the help of the email marketing strategy there are no geographical boundaries that can restrict you. This is certainly true and you can send emails to your target audience as well as clients irrespective of the geographical locations. This benefit is known to be one of the most important ones. With a number of benefits don’t you think that it is worth choosing the e-mail marketing Japan for your business?

After 1 Year, Obama Vs. Reagan

As we approach the end of the year, we are also approaching the end of President Obamas first year in office. You might be wondering how he is doing, based on actual numbers (rather than political spin).

Obama clearly inherited a difficult situation economically. Only two others in the modern era came even remotely close. One, of course, was FDR, but unfortunately the data from then is rather sparse, and mostly available on just an annual basis, or at best quarterly (good economic data was one of the by-products of the New Deal).

The other who inherited a difficult economic situation was President Reagan. Granted, the type of difficulty was very different under Reagan, and presidents — like quarterbacks — get too much of both the praise for a good economy and the blame for a bad economy.

Still, I think comparing the numbers for the two during their first “year in office could be instructive. The data I used for the comparison are all available monthly (at least, and if more frequently, I used the monthly data). The source of all data is the St. Louis Fed (except for the S&P 500).

The two presidents offered very different prescriptions for the economy. Reagan was all about cutting taxes and less government involvement in the economy. While most of the really big moves of government into the economy in response to the recent economic crisis actually took place under President George W. Bush, Candidate Obama saw them as needed. The Bush Administration was the one that bought the stakes in American International Group (AIG – Snapshot Report), Fannie Mae (FNM – Snapshot Report), Freddie Mac (FRE – Analyst Report) and the banks, while Obamas support for a prepackaged bankruptcy resulted in large government stakes in the Auto industry.

There were no comparable big investments by the government into the private sector late in the Carter Administration, and certainly Reagan did not initiate any. Reagan did not have to deal with a financial meltdown when he took office, but on the other hand, Obama did not have to deal with runaway inflation. Both are serious diseases, but think of it this way: both cancer and heart disease can kill you, but you would not want to give chemotherapy drugs to a heart attack patient. Thus, perhaps it is appropriate that the prescriptions be different.

If one only looks at the unemployment rate (U-3), both did a poor job in their first year, and Obama was significantly worse. The unemployment rate in January 2009 was 7.6% and by November it had climbed to 10.0%. In January 1981, when Reagan took office, the unemployment rate was almost identical at 7.5%, and by November of 1981 it had climbed to only 8.3%.

Private employment actually rose during the first 11 months of 1981 by 0.55%, from 74.671 million to 75.084 million. Under Obamas tenure so far, private payrolls have dropped by 2.95% to 108.495 million from 111.793 million.

So on the employment front, Reagan is the clear winner so far. However, over the course of 1982 and 1983 the employment situation deteriorated significantly. We do not know what unemployment will do in 2010 and 2011, and thus can only judge based on what we have seen so far and in the comparable period under Reagan.

Advantage: Reagan

Reagan also wins when it comes to real disposable personal income, which expanded by 2.3% in the first 11 months Reagan was in office, while it has only increased by 1.0% so far under Obama.

Advantage: Reagan

The dollar was also much stronger during the first 11 months of Reagan, although I am not sure if that is a positive or a negative. During the first 11 months of Reagan, the dollar relative to an index of major currencies gained 9.88%, while under Obama, the dollar has lost 9.70% relative to the same index.

Given that we are running chronic trade deficits now, but really were not back then, I would argue that today a weak dollar is good for the economy today since it will help out on the net export side of things. Inflation is not a big problem today, but was the number one problem with the economy when Reagan took office. The downside of a weak dollar is that it contributes to inflation, so back then having the dollar strengthening was a good thing.

No Advantage to Either

On the inflation front, however, things are far better under Obama. On a headline basis, prices have gone up by 2.39% so far under Obama, while they rose 7.57% during the first 11 months that Reagan was in office. On a core basis (ex-food and energy) the difference is even more stark, rising 8.31% under Reagan and up just 1.51% under Obama so far. Later in the Reagan Administration, inflation fell much more, but even when he left office in 1989 inflation was far higher than it is today.

Advantage: Obama

Industrial production fell slightly more during the first 11 months of Reagan (1.07%) than it has under the first 11 months of Obama (0.68%). Capacity Utilization started out at a much lower level when Obama took the oath than the Reagan did, at 71.1% (an all-time record low at the time) vs. 80.7% when Reagan took office. However, by November of 1981, the total capacity utilization rate had fallen to 77.9%. Under Obama, capacity utilization has actually risen to 71.3%, although it remains at a historically low level.

Advantage: Obama

Interest rates can tell a lot about the state of the economy. For example, the spread between the rate that gilt-edged companies have to pay on their bonds and what normal companies have to pay on their bonds tells a lot about how much bond investors fear companies going belly up. The former is measured by the Moodys (MCO – Analyst Report) Aaa rate and the later by the Baa rate (not to be confused with “junk bond” rates; Baa is still investment grade).

In January of 1981, the best credits in America had to pay 12.81% on their bonds, while normal companies had to pay 15.03%, for a spread of 2.22% (or as a ratio, normal companies had to pay 17.3% more than the gilt-edged ones). By November of 1981, both the best and the ordinary had to pay more — the Aaa rate had surged to 14.22% while the Baa rate had risen to 16.39%, so the spread had fallen ever-so-slightly to 2.17. The ratio had come down a bit more, and the ordinary firms were paying 15.3% more than the best firms.

When Obama took office, the Baa rate was 8.14% while the Aaa rate was 5.05%, for a spread of 3.09. In other words, ordinary firms had to pay 61.2% more for money than the best firms did. Investors were very afraid that companies would go bankrupt, and so demanded a higher rate from normal companies than from firms that seemed to have very little risk of writing a new chapter (the eleventh) in their corporate histories.

Since then, the rate the highest-rated firms have to pay has actually increased slightly to 5.19% while the rate that normal firms have to pay has plunged to 6.32%, bringing the spread down to 1.13% and the ratio down to the point where normal companies are paying 21.8% more for their money than the Aaa firms.

(Given the huge difference in the overall level of interest rates between the two eras, it is important to look at both the spreads and the ratios. Clearly a spread of 2% has a very different meaning and significance if it is between 1% and 3% than if it is between 13% and 15%).

Advantage: Obama

Another important signal that comes from interest rates is the yield curve, or the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates. The curve is measured using Treasury notes or bills, since you only want to be looking at the differences due to maturity, not due to quality (the opposite of the Aaa-Baa spread, which is only looking at quality differences, not maturity differences).

While there are many different measures of the curve, the one that is used the most is the difference between the 2-year note and the 10-year note. Generally speaking, the steeper the yield curve, the better. An inverted yield curve is very bad news, and is probably the best single indicator that the economy is about to go into a recession.

When Reagan entered office, the 10-2 curve was inverted, with the yield on a 2-year note at 13.26% and the yield on the 10-year at 12.57%, for a spread of -0.69. On a ratio basis, the 10-year was providing only 0.95 of the 2-year. By the time November of 1981 rolled around, the curve had returned to normal but was still pretty flat. The yield on the 2-year had fallen to 12.88%, while the yield on the 10-year had increased to 13.39, resulting in a positive curve of 0.51. On a ratio basis, the 10-year was 1.08 of the 2-year.

When Obama entered office, the 2-year was at a very low 0.81% while the 10-year was 2.52%, for a positive spread of 1.71%. On a ratio basis, the 10-year was yielding over three times as much as the 2-year (3.11x to be exact). By the end of November, the curve had expanded even further, with the 2-year virtually unchanged at 0.80%, while the yield on the 10-year had risen to 3.40%, for a spread of 2.60% and a ratio of 4.25x. Again, given the vastly different overall levels of rates, it is important to consider both the spreads and the ratios when making the comparisons.

Advantage: Obama

Mortgage rates were both far higher and moving in the wrong direction early in the Reagan presidency. When he took office they were at 14.90%, and by November they had risen to 17.83%. When Obama took office, the rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage was 5.06% and has since fallen to 4.88%.

Not surprisingly, then, the housing market was far worse under Reagan than it has been under Obama (at least if measured by direction, not levels). In January of 1981, housing starts were running at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.547 million, and by November of that year they had plunged to 837,000, a decline of 45.9%. Since January of 2009, housing starts have risen from an annualized rate of 488,000 to a rate of 574,000 in November, an increase of 17.6%.

Advantage: Obama

Similarly, single family new home sales plunged by 25.2% early in the Reagan years to a rate of 382,000. Since Obama came into office, new single family home sales have risen by 22.2% to an annualized rate of 402,000. Existing home sales are not particularly important to the economy (just like used car sales are not very important).

Auto sales also fared worse under the early part of the Reagan Administration than they have so far under Obama (at least as measured point-to-point). When Reagan took office, auto and light truck sales were running at an annualized rate of 11.03 million and had fallen to 9.21 million, a decline of 16.5%. Under Obama, auto and light truck sales have risen from an annualized rate of 9.59 million in January to a rate of 10.89 million in November, an increase of 13.6%.

Advantage: Obama

Finally, while people sometimes make too much of the day-to-day fluctuations in the stock market, it is a good reflection of the overall health of the economy when you look at longer time periods — and almost a year is long enough to qualify there. On that metric, there is simply no contest. Between inauguration day and Christmas Eve in 1981, the S&P 500 lost 7.65%. Since Obama took office, the S&P 500 has gained 39.9%.

Advantage: Obama

Weighing these different economic indicators is inherently subjective, and thus I am not sure that one can come to a clear-cut case that one has done a better job than the other — at least so far. This is also far from a complete list of economic indicators and I focused on only those that were available at least monthly, and many of the most important economic numbers come out quarterly.

Arguably, the economic mess that Obama inherited was worse than the one that Reagan inherited, although both were pretty nasty — yet very different. The U.S. economy is more of an oil tanker than a speedboat, and does not turn around on a dime, so it really is too early to tell how Obama is doing.

However, the indicators that are most forward-looking and leading for the economy (stock market, yield curve and quality spreads, housing starts) are the ones that favor Obama over Reagan. Overall, 11 months in, one must conclude that Obama is doing at least as good a job on the economy as Reagan did in his first 11 months.